Integration testing is a type of software testing in which software components are gradually integrated and then tested as a unified group. These parts typically function well independently, but they could malfunction when combined with other parts. When software modules are integrated, code conflicts can lead to defects. This is why integration testing is done.
Software module conflicts can occur for various reasons, including incompatibility between subsystem versions, data format inconsistencies, or processing logic disparities. Integration testing identifies these communication problems between software components. It usually happens before system testing and following unit testing.
Software module conflicts can occur for various reasons, including incompatibility between subsystem versions, data format inconsistencies, or processing logic disparities. Integration testing identifies these communication problems between software components. It usually happens before system testing and following unit testing.
Inconsistent code logic: The modules’ disparate authors’ differing approaches to development and logic make them difficult to integrate and may result in usability or functional problems. Integration testing produces an application that functions by ensuring that the code underlying these elements is in sync.
Requirements changing: Customers often have different needs. Sometimes, modifying one module’s code to accommodate new requirements necessitates completely altering the module’s code logic, which impacts the entire application. Because unit testing may only sometimes capture these changes, integration testing is necessary to find the flaws that are being missed.
Erroneous Data: When data is moved between modules, it can become inaccurate. When data is transferred improperly, it cannot be read or processed, which leads to bugs. Integration testing is necessary to identify the problem’s location for troubleshooting purposes.
API integrations and third-party services: Since data can change during transmission, these services risk receiving erroneous input and producing erroneous results. Integration testing ensures that these integrations communicate well.
Inadequate exception handling: Although developers typically consider exceptions when writing code, there are situations when this isn’t possible until modules are assembled. Thanks to integration testing, they can identify absent exception scenarios and make changes.
External Hardware Interfaces: Software-hardware incompatibility is another common cause of bugs, and it is quickly discovered through appropriate integration testing.
Read More: IT Outsourcing, How it helps companies to grow.
There are various methods for carrying out integration testing, each with pros and cons. The two most popular methods are as follows:
Three different methods carry out the Incremental Approach:
An approach to integration testing is to integrate and test each module individually, all at once, as a single unit. The integration process is not initiated until every component has undergone successful unit testing.
Advantages
Disadvantages
An approach known as incremental integration testing involves testing two or more modules with logic and functionality that are closely related to one another before progressively moving on to other groups of modules. This eliminates the need to test every module at once. Once every module has been tested and integrated, the process is over. Compared to Big Bang testing, incremental integration testing is more strategic and necessitates extensive planning in advance.
Advantages
Disadvantages
There are three smaller subcategories of incremental integration testing, and each has pros and cons that QA teams should carefully weigh before implementing a project. The following approaches are named according to the degree of influence that the software components undergoing integration have on the system as a whole:
Read More: DevOps Automation, What is DevOps and how it helps to automate software process.
Testers need to align with developers and clients on their vision and optimize their strategy along the way to have a comprehensive integration test strategy covering every aspect of the application. It is imperative to adhere to best practices for integration testing in any case:
Manual integration testing can be performed by QA teams, typically in parallel with the development process.
The process usually begins with the development team committing new code to a shared repository, followed by a series of unit tests to validate the new code. Then, QA testers select different components based on the test plan to manually inspect and interact with, checking for defects.
However, doing integration testing manually is only sometimes the best option.
Automated integration testing, whether using automation frameworks such as Selenium or automation testing tools, can significantly accelerate the process and free up resources for other tasks.
Integration testing is an integral part of software testing because it determines whether the modules can communicate effectively with one another, which unit testing cannot do. We can use either the Big Bang or the Incremental approach to integration testing, each with advantages and disadvantages.
API and UI Integration Testing are common types of integration testing. However, professionals may need help to perform those tests in a single location and must constantly switch from one tool to another when performing different testing types.
The types of Integration Testing are:
API testing is actually system integration testing (also known as interface testing). When performing integration testing, the two systems will most likely require an API to connect and communicate with one another. An API is a standardised way for systems to interact with one another.
Citrus. Citrus is a popular integration testing tool that is commonly used in software development projects. It provides a framework for testing the interactions of a system’s various components, such as web services, messaging systems, and databases.
An integration test is a type of functional testing that looks at how various modules interact with each other. PractiTest test management platform could greatly assist you in managing all types of functional and non-functional testing.
Fill the contact form protected by NDA, book a calendar and schedule a Zoom Meeting with our experts.
Get on a call with our team to know the feasibility of your project idea.
Based on the project requirements, we share a project proposal with budget and timeline estimates.
Once the project is signed, we bring together a team from a range of disciplines to kick start your project.
